On 17 October 2023, the First-Tier Tribunal of the General Regulatory Chamber – Information Rights (the Tribunal) handed down its decision in Clearview AI Inc v The Information Commissioner [2023] UKFTT 819, overturning the £7.5 million fine levied on Clearview AI Inc. (Clearview) by the ICO last year.Continue Reading Clearview AI Inc., successfully appeals £7.5 million fine from the ICO but the ICO is fighting back!
In the courts
CJEU rules on DPO conflicts of interest under the GDPR
The Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) issued a judgment on the 9th of February 2023 (docket no. C-453/21), which addresses the question of the dismissal of a Data Protection Officer (“DPO”) and the interpretation of Article 38 of the EU GDPR.Continue Reading CJEU rules on DPO conflicts of interest under the GDPR
‘Mere upset’ insufficient for compensation under the GDPR
By Cynthia O’Donoghue & Sophie Ainscough on
On 6 October 2022, the Advocate General (Campos Sánchez-Bordona) issued his opinion in UI v Österreichische Post AG on the interpretation of the rules on civil liability under the GDPR .
He concluded that a data subject must have suffered harm in order to claim compensation, and that breach of the GDPR alone was not sufficient. There is also a distinction to be drawn between mere upset (which does not give rise to a right for compensation) and non-material damage (which does).Continue Reading ‘Mere upset’ insufficient for compensation under the GDPR