Photo of Samuel F. Cullari

In one of his earliest official acts, President Trump appointed FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai as the long-term Chairman of the FCC. While many thought Commissioner Pai was the most likely candidate to be named interim Chairman of the Commission, President Trump skipped the interim step and immediately appointed Chairman Pai on a long-term basis. This decision is significant because it eliminates the need for the Senate to confirm Chairman Pai. While the appointment of a new FCC Commissioner requires Senate confirmation, the president has the authority to name the chairman from existing FCC Commissioners with no further action required. For the time being, Chairman Pai will head a three-member, Republican majority panel consisting of fellow Republican Commissioner Michael O’Rielly and Democrat Commissioner Mignon Clyburn. There are currently two vacant seats on the five-member Commission.

While it is difficult to predict the exact course in which Chairman Pai will lead the Commission, one thing is certain: under his leadership, the FCC will be vastly different than under previous Chairman Tom Wheeler.

As a Commissioner during the Obama administration since 2012, Chairman Pai strongly dissented to most of the significant rulemaking proceedings championed by former Chairman Wheeler. Notably, Chairman Pai was adamantly opposed to adoption of the 2015 “Open Internet” Order, as well as the subsequent Broadband Privacy Order of 2016.Continue Reading Ajit Pai Appointed Chairman of the FCC – Expect Change

On October 27, 2016, the FCC adopted a new set of privacy and data security regulations applicable to “broadband service providers and other telecommunications carriers.”

The rules place new restrictions on internet service providers’ (“ISPs”) ability to use and share their customers’ data. The Commission established two data classifications: (1) sensitive information, and (2) non-sensitive

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) applies in many circumstances when companies use an automatic telephone dialing system (or “autodialer”) and/or pre-recorded messages to call consumers. In those situations where the TCPA does apply, the company cannot make the call unless it is an “emergency,” or unless the company has the prior express consent of the called party.  The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) has the power to exempt certain categories of calls from the TCPA’s requirements.

The TCPA is vigorously enforced by the FCC and has also been the source of extensive class action litigation, including suits against utilities. Any violation of the TCPA can subject the calling company to statutory damages of $500 to $1,500 per call.  Those statutory damages can quickly add up to millions or tens of millions of dollars in liability.  Given this regulatory framework and potential liability, entities have petitioned the FCC for clarification regarding definitions in the TCPA and the application of the law to certain types of telephone communications.

The Edison Electric Institute and American Gas Association recently filed a petition with the FCC (the “EEI/AGA Petition”), seeking confirmation that “under the TCPA, providing a wireless telephone number to an energy utility constitutes ‘prior express consent’ to receive, at that number, non-telemarketing, informational calls related to the customer’s utility service, which are placed using an autodialer or an artificial or prerecorded voice.” The FCC has previously found that a consumer providing his or her telephone number signifies prior express consent to be called on that number for purposes that relate to the reason the number was provided.  For example, providing a phone number on a credit application signifies prior express consent to be called on that number for purposes related to that credit account.  The EEI/AGA sought clarification that such guidance applied in the context of providing telephone numbers to utility companies.

In a declaratory ruling released August 4, 2016, the FCC granted the EEI/AGA Petition. The FCC found that:  “in the absence of facts supporting a contrary finding, prior to the termination of a customer’s utility service, a customer who provided a wireless telephone number when he or she initially signed up to receive utility service, subsequently supplied the wireless telephone number, or later updated his or her contact information, is deemed to have given prior express consent to be contacted by their utility company for calls that are closely related to the service[.]”Continue Reading The FCC Clarifies Prior Express Consent Under the TCPA for Calls to Utility Company Customers

Initial comments are due on May 27, 2016 regarding the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) released last month by the FCC in its broadband privacy proceeding. The rules proposed in the NPRM have already been the subject of contentious discussions throughout the federal government and the communications industry. Those discussions included a hearing earlier